- Campaign
Literature Archive « Campaign
Managers
Campaign Managers
As an
additional resource in the Campaign Literature Archive,
following the notes on each race I include biographical
blurbs on the campaign managers. A good campaign
manager, maximizing available resources, can help steer
a candidate and campaign to success, while a bad one, or
one who is not a good fit, can hamstring the effort.
Thus it is worth considering the varied backgrounds,
experience, skills, and approaches of these individuals.
Running the Campaign Day to Day | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The campaign manager, charged with the day to day
running of a campaign, faces a challenging job working
with the candidate to steer his or her campaign from
launch to Election Day. The starting point is
the relationship with the candidate. Then, he or
she must build and manage a team that will work
together, maximizing the experience and capabilities
of staff, consultants and advisors; harnessing the
energy of supporters; presenting to voters the best of
the candidate; and implementing a strategy that will
lead to electoral victory, or at least get the
candidate's message out. This requires making
sure that the different elements of the campaign
team—political, field, communications and so forth—are
running smoothly. It requires long hours over a
period of months leading to Election Day. A good
campaign manager has the ability to work with people
of varying personalities, can respond to changing and
unexpected situations that arise during the course of
a campaign, and must have the confidence of the
candidate. Most of the campaign managers for major party Senate
and gubernatorial nominees bring considerable
experience to the task, having worked on many
campaigns. Some have worked for the candidate in
his or her office and/or on one or more of their
previous campaigns. If they haven't worked for
the candidate, they may have years of experience in
state politics. Alternatively, the candidate may
bring in an outsider who had worked in races around
the country. (The DGA and RGA national party
committees can suggest possibilities). In a few
instances, the manager may be brought in from the
private sector with little or no campaign
experience. For less resourced, less competitive
races, the campaign manager may have more limited
political experience. Some campaigns don't have a campaign manager, but
rather a campaign coordinator or director of
operations, who fills only some of the duties that a
campaign manager would. One sees this sometimes
with strong, well-bankrolled incumbents in
non-competitive races. At the other extreme, in
very low budget campaigns, the candidate often serves
as his or her own campaign manager and, depending on
the budget, may have a number of people/consultants
under contract for various tasks. Finally, note that titles can be misleading; in some cases it is not the campaign manager but the senior strategist or campaign chairman who is "calling the shots." Campaigns and campaign organizations are fluid.
Each cycle there are a handful of races where a
candidate replaces the campaign manager for one reason
or another. Campaigns do go through various
phases, and the person brought on to start up a
campaign or navigate a primary may not be the best
person to lead the push to the finish in
November. To use a baseball analogy, there are
starting pitchers and relievers. Not
infrequently a change is made after the primary, as
the race heads into the general election. It can
occur earlier, for example if fundraising is not
meeting expectations or if the campaign is lagging in
the polls. The parting may be amicable or
not. Sometimes the campaign manager may move to
a senior advisory role or remain on the payroll in
another capacity; other times they may be fired.
Replacement of a campaign manager may be normal
evolution or a sign of trouble. Invariably the
media will cover the change or "shake-up," and
questions will be asked about the state of the
campaign. As an example, looking at the 2018 races for governor, based on media reports, nine of the 36 Democratic campaigns (25-percent) changed managers and two of those did so twice (+). [Five of the nine went on to win]. According to media reports, five of the 36 Republican campaigns changed leadership. Methodological Considerations Campaign managers
were identified primarily through online search
of news articles. Where that doesn't
produce a result, one can look at the
FEC reports to see who are the highest paid
staff, although there are quite a few cases
where the finance director earns more than the
campaign manager. Other former
staff or even the former candidate can
also be helpful. The
biographical blurbs are compiled from news accounts,
LinkedIn, company websites (many staff work or have
worked for consulting firms), and Legistorm. It
takes considerable research to put these
together. A campaign may put out a press release
at the outset announcing senior staff, but after that
staff generally like to stay in the background and out
of the news. There are exceptions; on smaller
campaigns the campaign manager may also serve as
spokesperson. While the lists I have put together have some holes,
they do provide a good representation of the campaign
managers and the experience they bring. Keep in mind, however, that this sample only
covers governor and U.S. Senate race and provides
no information on other statewide races or on
local races. |
Governor |
Number Identified |
Male |
Female |
U.S. Senate |
Number Identified |
Male |
Female |
Total # Identified |
Male |
Female |
||
2012 | 19 |
63.2% |
36.8% |
2012 | 56 |
78.6% |
21.4% |
75 |
74.7% |
25.3% |
||
Democratic | 10 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 28 | 60.7% | 39.3% | 38 | 57.9% | 42.1% | |||
Republican | 9 | 77.8% | 22.2% | 28 | 96.4% | 3.6% | 37 | 91.9% | 8.1% | |||
2014 |
63 |
85.7% |
14.3% |
2014 |
54 |
81.5% |
18.5% |
117 |
83.8% |
16.2% |
||
Democratic |
29 |
86.2% |
13.8% |
24 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
53 |
81.1% |
18.9% |
|||
Republican |
34 |
85.3% |
14.7% |
30 |
86.7% |
13.3% |
64 |
85.9% |
14.1% |
|||
2016 |
22 |
81.8% |
18.2% |
2016 | 43 |
83.7% |
16.3% |
65 |
83.1% |
16.9% |
||
Democratic |
12 |
83.3% |
17.7% |
24 |
79.2% |
20.8% |
36 |
80.6% |
19.4% |
|||
Republican |
10 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
19 |
89.5% |
10.5% |
29 |
86.2% |
13.8% |
|||
2018 |
68 |
69.1% |
30.9% |
2018 | 57 |
64.9% |
35.1% |
125 |
67.2% |
32.8% |
||
Democratic |
35 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
30 |
56.7% |
43.3% |
65 |
69.1% |
30.9% |
|||
Republican |
33 |
78.8% |
21.2% |
27 |
74.1 |
25.9% |
60 |
76.7% |
23.3% |
|||
2020 |
19 |
78.9% |
21.1% |
2020 | 57 |
80.7% |
19.3% |
76 |
80.3% |
19.7% |
||
Democratic | 9 | 55.6% | 44.4% | 32 |
71.9% |
28.1% |
41 |
65.1% |
34.9% |
|||
Republican | 10 | 100% | 0% | 25 |
92.0% |
8.0% |
35 |
94.3% |
5.7% |
Looking at the Governor and U.S. Senate
races from 2014-20, two points are very clear.
First, at this level, campaign managers are heavily
skewed male, and second, the imbalance is much more
significant on the Republican side. Indeed, over
these five cycles, Republicans had a couple of
astounding cycles. In 2012, 27 of 28 campaign
managers identified for Republican Senate candidates
were male, and in 2020, 10 of 10 campaign managers
identified for Republican gubernatorial candidates
were male. Democrats showed more balance, but
still had off years. Thus in 2012, 42.1% of
Democratic campaign managers identified for Democratic
Senate and gubernatorial candidates were women, and in
2020, 34.9%; however in 2014, only 18.9% were women
and in 2016, 19.4%. No trends emerge from the
set of data. As women make gains in the
workplace, one expects that the number of female
campaign managers will increase. # # #
|