Lead Up to the House Vote on the Impeachment Inquiry

October 28-31, 2019

____________

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
October 28, 2019

Dear Colleague on Next Steps in House's Ongoing Impeachment Inquiry

OCTOBER 28, 2019 
PRESS RELEASE
H. Res. ___ — Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes. 
***
Dear Democratic Colleague,

For weeks, the President, his Counsel in the White House, and his allies in Congress have made the baseless claim that the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry “lacks the necessary authorization for a valid impeachment proceeding.”  They argue that, because the House has not taken a vote, they may simply pretend the impeachment inquiry does not exist.

Of course, this argument has no merit.  The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.”  Multiple past impeachments have gone forward without any authorizing resolutions.  Just last week, a federal court confirmed that the House is not required to hold a vote and that imposing such a requirement would be “an impermissible intrusion on the House’s constitutional authority.”  More than 300 legal scholars have also refuted this argument, concluding that “the Constitution does not mandate the process for impeachment and there is no constitutional requirement that the House of Representatives authorize an impeachment inquiry before one begins.”

The Trump Administration has made up this argument – apparently out of whole cloth – in order to justify its unprecedented cover-up, withhold key documents from multiple federal agencies, prevent critical witnesses from cooperating, and defy duly authorized subpoenas.

This week, we will bring a resolution to the Floor that affirms the ongoing, existing investigation that is currently being conducted by our committees as part of this impeachment inquiry, including all requests for documents, subpoenas for records and testimony, and any other investigative steps previously taken or to be taken as part of this investigation.  

This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process rights for the President and his Counsel.

We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump Administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives.
 
Nobody is above the law.

best regards,

[Nancy Pelosi]

The Committee on Rules will meet on Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 3:00 PM in H-313, The Capitol on the following measure:
  • H. Res. ___ — Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes. [Original Jurisdiction Markup]

  • Committee Report

House of Representatives Committee on Rules
Jame P. McGovern, Chairman

Key Provisions in the Resolution

Reaffirms the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
• The resolution makes clear that the investigating committees have been engaged in an impeachment inquiry and directs them to continue their vital work.

Ensures transparency.
• The resolution authorizes HPSCI to make transcripts of their recent depositions public with appropriate redactions made for classified or other sensitive information.
• The resolution establishes procedures for all investigating committees to transmit their evidence to the Committee on the Judiciary for use in their proceedings.

Enables effective public hearings.
• The resolution permits staff counsels to follow their lines of inquiry to their ends by allowing for periods of up to 45 minutes per side in the questioning of witnesses.
o This approach builds on the precedent of having staff counsels conduct initial questioning, followed by Member questions, that Republicans set for the questioning of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in 1998.
• The resolution also continues the precedent of giving the minority the same rights to question witnesses that the majority has, as has been true at every step of the inquiry.

Provides the President opportunities to participate.
• The resolution establishes opportunities for the President or his counsel to participate in impeachment proceedings held by the Committee on the Judiciary, including to:
o Present their case and respond to evidence; o Submit written requests for additional testimony or other evidence; o Attend hearings, including those held in executive session;
o Raise an objection to testimony given; and
o Cross-examine witnesses.
• If the President unlawfully refuses to cooperate with Congressional requests, the Chair shall have the discretion to impose appropriate remedies, including by denying specific requests by the President or his counsel.

Directs the Committee on the Judiciary to review the evidence and, if necessary, to report Articles of Impeachment to the House.
• Following the precedent of every modern impeachment inquiry, the Committee on the Judiciary will decide whether Articles shall be reported to the House.

###

Washington, October 29, 2019

Four Chairs Statement on Resolution for Open Hearings on Trump’s Abuse of Power

Washington, DC – Today, Rep. Adam B. Schiff, the Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. Eliot L. Engel, the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and Rep. Carolyn Maloney, the Acting Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, issued the following statement:

“The House impeachment inquiry has collected extensive evidence and testimony, and soon the American people will hear from witnesses in an open setting.  The resolution introduced today in the House Rules Committee will provide that pathway forward. 

“The resolution provides rules for the format of open hearings in the House Intelligence Committee, including staff-led questioning of witnesses, and it authorizes the public release of deposition transcripts.

“The resolution also establishes procedures for the transfer of evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and it sets forth due process rights for the President and his Counsel in the Judiciary Committee proceedings.

“The evidence we have already collected paints the picture of a President who abused his power by using multiple levers of government to press a foreign country to interfere in the 2020 election. Following in the footsteps of previous impeachment inquiries, the next phase will move from closed depositions to open hearings where the American people will learn firsthand about the President’s misconduct.”

###


[Report No. 116–266]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 29, 2019
Mr. McGovern (for himself, Mr. Hastings, Mrs. Torres of California, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Morelle, Ms. Shalala, and Mr. DeSaulnier) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

October 30, 2019
Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed


RESOLUTION

Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes.

Resolved, That the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committees on Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, the Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, and Ways and Means, are directed to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America.

SEC. 2. OPEN AND TRANSPARENT INVESTIGATIVE PROCEEDINGS BY THE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE.

For the purpose of continuing the investigation described in the first section of this resolution, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (referred to in this resolution as the “Permanent Select Committee”) is authorized to conduct proceedings pursuant to this resolution as follows:

(1) The chair of the Permanent Select Committee shall designate an open hearing or hearings pursuant to this section.

(2) Notwithstanding clause 2(j)(2) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, upon recognition by the chair for such purpose under this paragraph during any hearing designated pursuant to paragraph (1), the chair and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee shall be permitted to question witnesses for equal specified periods of longer than five minutes, as determined by the chair. The time available for each period of questioning under this paragraph shall be equal for the chair and the ranking minority member. The chair may confer recognition for multiple periods of such questioning, but each period of questioning shall not exceed 90 minutes in the aggregate. Only the chair and ranking minority member, or a Permanent Select Committee employee if yielded to by the chair or ranking minority member, may question witnesses during such periods of questioning. At the conclusion of questioning pursuant to this paragraph, the committee shall proceed with questioning under the five-minute rule pursuant to clause 2(j)(2)(A) of rule XI.

(3) To allow for full evaluation of minority witness requests, the ranking minority member may submit to the chair, in writing, any requests for witness testimony relevant to the investigation described in the first section of this resolution within 72 hours after notice is given for the first hearing designated pursuant to paragraph (1). Any such request shall be accompanied by a detailed written justification of the relevance of the testimony of each requested witness to the investigation described in the first section of this resolution.

(4) (A) The ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee is authorized, with the concurrence of the chair, to require, as deemed necessary to the investigation—
(i) by subpoena or otherwise—
(I) the attendance and testimony of any person (including at a taking of a deposition); and
(II) the production of books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents; and
(ii) by interrogatory, the furnishing of information.

(B) In the case that the chair declines to concur in a proposed action of the ranking minority member pursuant to subparagraph (A), the ranking minority member shall have the right to refer to the committee for decision the question whether such authority shall be so exercised and the chair shall convene the committee promptly to render that decision, subject to the notice procedures for a committee meeting under clause 2(g)(3)(A) and (B) of rule XI.

(C) Subpoenas and interrogatories so authorized may be signed by the ranking minority member, and may be served by any person designated by the ranking minority member.

(5) The chair is authorized to make publicly available in electronic form the transcripts of depositions conducted by the Permanent Select Committee in furtherance of the investigation described in the first section of this resolution, with appropriate redactions for classified and other sensitive information.

(6) The Permanent Select Committee is directed to issue a report setting forth its findings and any recommendations and appending any information and materials the Permanent Select Committee may deem appropriate with respect to the investigation described in the first section of this resolution. The chair shall transmit such report and appendices, along with any supplemental, minority, additional, or dissenting views filed pursuant to clause 2(l) of rule XI, to the Committee on the Judiciary and make such report publicly available in electronic form, with appropriate redactions to protect classified and other sensitive information. The report required by this paragraph shall be prepared in consultation with the chairs of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Oversight and Reform.

SEC. 3. TRANSMISSION OF ADDITIONAL MATERIALS.
The chair of the Permanent Select Committee or the chair of any other committee having custody of records or other materials relating to the inquiry referenced in the first section of this resolution is authorized, in consultation with the ranking minority member, to transfer such records or materials to the Committee on the Judiciary.

SEC. 4. IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PROCEDURES IN THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.

(a) The House authorizes the Committee on the Judiciary to conduct proceedings relating to the impeachment inquiry referenced in the first section of this resolution pursuant to the procedures submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the chair of the Committee on Rules, including such procedures as to allow for the participation of the President and his counsel.

(b) The Committee on the Judiciary is authorized to promulgate additional procedures as it deems necessary for the fair and efficient conduct of committee hearings held pursuant to this resolution, provided that the additional procedures are not inconsistent with the procedures referenced in subsection (a), the Rules of the Committee, and the Rules of the House.

(c) (1) The ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized, with the concurrence of the chair of the Committee on the Judiciary, to require, as deemed necessary to the investigation—

(A) by subpoena or otherwise—
(i) the attendance and testimony of any person (including at a taking of a deposition); and
(ii) the production of books, records, correspondence, memoranda, papers, and documents; and

(B) by interrogatory, the furnishing of information.

(2) In the case that the chair declines to concur in a proposed action of the ranking minority member pursuant to paragraph (1), the ranking minority member shall have the right to refer to the committee for decision the question whether such authority shall be so exercised and the chair shall convene the committee promptly to render that decision, subject to the notice procedures for a committee meeting under clause 2(g)(3)(A) and (B) of rule XI.

(3) Subpoenas and interrogatories so authorized may be signed by the ranking minority member, and may be served by any person designated by the ranking minority member.

(d) The Committee on the Judiciary shall report to the House of Representatives such resolutions, articles of impeachment, or other recommendations as it deems proper.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
October 30, 2019

House Democrats’ Impeachment Resolution: No Due Pocess Now, Maybe Some Later, But Only If We Feel Like It

‘Any such inquiry must be conducted by the highest standards of fairness and due process. But thus far, this time around, instead of setting a high bar, House Democrats seem determined to set a new low…“No due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it” is not a standard that should ever be applied to any American. And it should not be applied here to the president of the United States.’

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) delivered the following remarks today on the Senate floor regarding the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry resolution:

“Yesterday, House Democrats released their much-hyped resolution which was advertised as bringing fairness and due process into Speaker Pelosi’s and Chairman Schiff’s closed-door, partisan inquiry.

“Unfortunately, the draft resolution that has been released does nothing of the sort. It falls way short.

“As I have said repeatedly, an impeachment inquiry is about the most solemn and serious process the House of Representatives can embark on. It seeks to effectively nullify a democratic election and cancel out the American people’s choice of a commander-in-chief.

“For that reason, any such inquiry must be conducted by the highest standards of fairness and due process. But thus far, this time around, instead of setting a high bar, House Democrats seem determined to set a new low.

“Speaker Pelosi has initiated a bizarre process, starting with the fact that she began it with a press conference instead of a proper vote of the House. The process seems to be treating Chairman Schiff as though he were a de facto Special Prosecutor, notwithstanding the fact that he’s a partisan member of Congress whose strange behavior has already included fabricating a lengthy quotation and attributing it to President Trump during an official hearing which he was chairing.

“House Democrats’ inquiry thus far has been conducted behind closed doors. They have denied their Republican counterparts privileges which Democrats received during the Clinton impeachment when they were in the minority.

“And unlike during the inquiries around both President Clinton and President Nixon, they have denied President Trump basic due process rights and are cutting his counsel out of the process in an unprecedented way.

“House Democrats’ new resolution does not change any of that. It does not confer on President Trump the most basic rights of due process or, seemingly, alter Chairman Schiff’s unfair process in the House Intelligence Community in any way whatsoever. Chairman Schiff can continue doing this behind closed doors without the President’s participation, so long as he holds at least one public hearing at some point.

“He’s not even required to make all the evidence he obtains public. He alone gets to decide what evidence goes in his report. And the resolution doesn’t even give the President any rights in the public hearing that it requires Chairman Schiff to hold.

“The resolution merely seems to contemplate that, maybe…someday in the future…at some other phase of this…due process might finally kick in. But only if the House Judiciary Committee feels like holding hearings and calling its own witnesses.

“In other words: ‘No due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it.’

“Well, that is not even close to fair. ‘No due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it’ is not a standard that should ever be applied to any American. And it should not be applied here to the president of the United States.

“I understand that many House Democrats made up their minds on impeachment years ago. But our basic norms of justice do not evaporate just because Washington Democrats have already made up their minds.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
October 31, 2019

Pelosi Floor Speech in Support of Resolution for Open Hearings on Trump’s Abuse of Power

Washington, D.C.  – Speaker Nancy Pelosi delivered remarks on the Floor of the House of Representatives in support of H. Res. 660, which establishes the procedure for the next phase of the House’s impeachment inquiry.  Below are the Speaker’s remarks:

Speaker Pelosi.  I thank the gentleman for yielding.

And, Madam Speaker, thank you for the recognition.

I want to begin my remarks [with] some of the most beautiful words in our country's history: ‘We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity to ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States.’

It goes on, immediately, to establish Article I, the Legislative Branch; Article II, the Executive Branch; Article III, the Judiciary.  The genius of the Constitution, a separation of powers: three co-equal branches of government to be a check and balance on each other.  And, it's to that that we take the oath of office.  We gather here on that opening day with our families gathered round to proudly raise our hands to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.  And, that is exactly what we are doing today.

Sadly, this is not any cause for any glee or comfort.  This is something that is very solemn, that is something prayerful.  And, that we had to gather so much information to take us to this next step. 
Again, this is a solemn occasion.  Nobody, I doubt anybody in this place, or anybody that you know, comes to Congress to take the oath of office, comes to Congress to impeach the President of the United States, unless his actions are jeopardizing our honoring our oath of office.

I’m grateful to our Committee Chairs for all the careful and thoughtful investigation they have been doing as this inquiry has proceeded.  Today, the House takes the next step forward as we establish the procedures for open hearings, conducted by the House Intelligence Committee, so that the public can see the facts for themselves.

This resolution ensures transparency, advancing public disclosure of depositions transcripts and outlining the procedures for the transfer of evidence to the Judiciary Committee to use in its proceedings.

It enables effective public hearings: setting out procedures for the questioning of witnesses and continuing the precedent of giving the Minority the same rights in questioning witnesses as the Majority, which has been true at every step of this inquiry despite what you might hear.

It provides the President and his counsel opportunities to participate, including presenting his case, submitting requests for testimony, attending hearings, raising objections to testimony given, cross-examining witnesses and more.  And, contrary to what you heard today, we gave more opportunity to the – to his case than was given to other Presidents before.  And, thank you, Mr. Chairman, for making that point so clearly.

These actions, this process, these open hearings, seeking the truth and making it available to the American people, will inform Congress on the very difficult decisions we will have to make in the future as to whether to impeach the President.

That decision has not been made.  That's what the inquiry will investigate and then we can make the decision, based on the truth.  I don't know why the Republicans are afraid of the truth.  Every Member should support allowing the American people to hear the facts for themselves.  This – that is really what this vote is about.  It is about the truth.

And, what is at stake?  What is at stake, in all of this, is nothing less than our democracy. 
I proudly stand next to the flag, and I thank the gentleman from New York for providing it for us.  This flag, so many have fought and died for this flag, which stands for our democracy.

When Benjamin Franklin came out of Independence Hall –  you heard this over and over – on September 17, 1787, the day our Constitution was adopted, he came out of Independence Hall, people said to him, ‘Dr. Franklin, what do we have a monarchy or a republic?’  And, he said, as you know, he said, ‘A republic, if we can keep it.’  If we can keep it.

And this Constitution is the blueprint for our republic and not a monarchy.  But, when we have a President who says, ‘Article II says I can do whatever I want,’ that is in defiance of the separation of powers.  That's not what our Constitution says.

So, what is at stake is our democracy.  What are we fighting for?  Defending our democracy for the people.

You know in the early days of our revolution, Thomas Paine said, ‘The times have found us.’  The times found our Founders to declare independence from a monarchy, to fight a war of independence, write our founding documents and thank God they made them amendable so we can always be expanding freedom.  And, the genius, again that genius of that Constitution was the separation of power.  Any usurping of that power is a violation of our oath of office.

So, proudly, you all, we all raised our hands to protect and defend and support the Constitution of the United States.  That's what this vote is about.

Today – we think the time found our Founders, the times found others in the course of our history to protect our democracy, to keep our country united.  The times have found each and every one of us in this room and in our country to pay attention to how we protect and defend the Constitution of the United States – honoring the vision of our Founders who declared independence from a monarch and established a country contrary to that principle, honoring men and women in uniform who fight for our freedom and for our democracy and honoring the aspirations of our children so that no President, whoever he or she may be in the future, could decide that Article II says they can do whatever they want.

Again, let us honor our oath of office.  Let us defend our democracy.  Let us have a good vote today and have clarity, clarity as to how we proceed, why we proceed, and again, doing so in a way that honors the Constitution.  We must honor the Constitution and how we do this.  We must respect the institution we serve.  And, we must heed the further words of our Founders, ‘E pluribus unim,’ from many one.  They didn't know how many we would be, or how different we would be, but they knew we needed to always be unify.

Hopefully, as we go forward with this, the clarity of purpose, the clarity of procedure, a clarity of fact, a clarity of truth about the truth – it's about the Constitution – we will do so in a way that brings people together that is healing rather than dividing.  And, that is how we will honor our oath of office.

I urge an aye vote and yield back the balance of my time.

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy

Leader McCarthy Speech Against the Sham Impeachment Vote

Washington D.C. – House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (CA-23) delivered a speech today on the House floor condemning the Democrats’ patently unfair impeachment resolution.

Remarks as prepared are below.

“Elections have consequences. Our fellow Americans use their vote to choose who will work for them. So I ask a simple question to my colleagues: is that what is happening here?

“Are we gathered today in the final moments before we fund the government and give our troops the pay raise they deserve? Are we gathered to approve a transformative new trade deal? Are we gathered to debate critical national security issues regarding adversaries like China or Iran?

“We are not.

“These would resemble the achievements of a productive Congress —  a Congress that truly works ‘for the people.’ But this Congress counts more subpoenas than laws as its legacy. It is not just devoid of solutions for the American people — it is now abusing its power to discredit democracy.

“By using secret interviews and selective leaks to portray the President’s legitimate actions as an impeachable offense, Democrats are continuing their permanent campaign to undermine his legitimacy.

“For the last three years, they have predetermined the President’s guilt. They have never accepted the voters’ choice to make him president. So, for 37 days and counting, they have run an unprecedented, undemocratic, and unfair investigation. This resolution only makes it worse.

“The amendment offered by my colleague Mr. Cole would help correct some of the transparency concerns we have witnessed over the last few weeks. But today is about more than the fairness of the impeachment process. It is about the integrity of our electoral process. Democrats are trying to impeach the President because they are scared they can’t defeat him at the ballot box.

“This impeachment is not only an attempt to undo the last election — it is an attempt to influence the next one too. If this approach becomes the new norm, it would be a disaster for democracy. The balance of power between the sovereign people and their representatives will shift further away from the people.

“This is not what Democrats promised when they entered the majority 11 months ago. In this chamber, we heard from the Speaker as she opened a new Congress with words of optimism and cooperation.

“It was said we would work together to make America stronger, more secure, and more prosperous. We were told our mission was to return power to the people. In fact, our new colleagues on the other side of the aisle were sent to Washington with a mandate to do just that.

“Is that what is happening today? No.

“Not long ago, Democrats recognized that a partisan impeachment would put politics over people and harm our nation. The Speaker said: ‘impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country.’

“Alexander Hamilton wrote that ‘there will always be the greatest danger’ that the decision to use the impeachment power would be driven by partisan ‘animosities’ instead of ‘real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.’ This sham impeachment by Democrats has proven Hamilton right. And it betrays the Speaker’s own words.

“The only bipartisan vote we will have this morning is a vote NOT to impeach. What does that tell you about the state of this institution? More subpoenas than laws. And a wholly partisan attempt to remove a duly elected President from office.

“Tomorrow is November 1st. In just 12 months Americans will go to the ballot box and cast their vote for their representative in Congress and for President of the United States. The right to choose our elected leaders is the inherent right of Americans. Next year will be another opportunity for the American people to cast their vote, make their voices heard, and take part in the democratic system that defines the very idea of who we are.

“But Democrats are working to prevent that choice from being a free choice. That is the takeaway from today’s disastrous vote. Democrats cannot trust the American people to make their own decisions. Why?

“To my colleagues on the other side, I say this: Give the people back their power. Let them choose the next leader of the free world. Follow the principles of our Constitution. And do not dilute our democracy by interfering in elections from Washington.”

Republican National Committee
October 31, 2019

Pelosi breaks her promise

March 2019, Nancy Pelosi set the ground rules for impeachment: It must be “bipartisan.”

 

'I'm not for impeachment'
without bipartisan support,
Pelosi says, roiling fellow
Democrats


The Washington Post

 

Yet today’s vote showed there is no bipartisan support for Pelosi and Schiff’s Soviet-style impeachment inquiry. In fact, there is bipartisan opposition.
 
In March, Pelosi said she wasn’t supportive of impeachment because “I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country.”
 
But with this vote, Democrats made dividing this country their number one priority.
 
And contrary to the Democrats’ talking points that their new rules provide a more open process, it does the opposite, it’s about control. King Schiff is still going to shred due process with secret hearings where President Trump’s counsel isn’t allowed to attend.
 
Stop The Madness. In their last act before going on their 12-day recess, Democrats solidified their sham impeachment inquiry instead of passing the USMCA, voting on a bipartisan lowering of prescription drug legislation, or combatting the opioid crisis.
 
 
Steve Guest
Rapid Response Director
Republican National Committee

_______________________

RNC Statement on Adam Schiff's Coronation as Witch Hunt King

WASHINGTON — Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel released the following statement on Adam Schiff's Coronation as Witch Hunt King:

"Since they lost in 2016, Democrats have had one goal and one goal only: impeaching President Trump by any means possible," said Chairwoman McDaniel. "All this sham resolution does is coronate Adam Schiff as King of the Democrats’ latest witch hunt, and today’s partisan vote proves it is only motivated by politics. The American people want a Congress that works for them — not one whose sole focus is smearing their duly-elected President."
 
###

zzzAmericans for Limited Government
For Immediate Release  Oct. 31, 2019                   
Contact: Robert Romano

Pelosi drives House majority off a cliff with witch hunt

Oct. 31, 2019, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Rick Manning today issued the following statement in response to the House's vote on the impeachment inquiry resolution against President Donald Trump:

"Nancy Pelosi's impeachment gambit has effectively driven her majority in the House off a cliff as only two Democrats who represent strong Trump districts voted against the ongoing and unfair impeachment witch hunt. A wise Speaker would have been content with a simple majority vote, allowing those vulnerable members to present the illusion of honesty and fairness rather than revealing themselves as Trump derangement syndrome enablers. Democrats Collin Peterson and Jeff Van Drew's votes against the probe have earned praise for standing up to Pelosi and in favor of their constituents, due process and the truth. While this may scare some GOP establishment insiders, the 2020 Congressional election will be nationalized as an up or down on President Trump, and Pelosi just handed them the key to Republican control of the House in 2020 if only they are smart enough to grab it and use it.

"The House GOP leadership has done a remarkable job of educating their members about Pelosi and Schiff's abuses of power, consolidating Republican support across inter-conference lines against this impeachment inquiry driven by blind hatred that shields political good judgment. The only question is when House Democrat survival instincts will kick in resulting in massive defections from the demands of the AOC-led radical political impeachment push."

To view online: https://getliberty.org/2019/10/pelosi-drives-house-majority-off-a-cliff-with-witch-hunt/

Interview Availability: Please contact Americans for Limited Government at 703-383-0880 ext. 1 or at media@limitgov.org to arrange an interview.

###

Cory 2020

Cory Booker Statement on House Vote to Formalize Impeachment Inquiry

Newark, NJ — Cory Booker issued the following statement after the House of Representatives voted to formalize the impeachment inquiry: 

“House Democrats are running these proceedings in a way that puts partisan politics aside and sets up a process that builds consensus by ensuring the American people see all of the damning evidence against Donald Trump. He may have betrayed his oath of office, but we will honor ours.”

# # #

Tom Steyer 2020

Steyer Statement on House Vote on Impeachment Proceedings

(SAN FRANCISCO, October 31, 2019) — Today, candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination Tom Steyer released this statement following the U.S. House of Representatives’ vote to formalize impeachment proceedings and outline the rules for holding public hearings: 

“Today’s House vote marks another significant step forward in restoring trust in our democracy and delivering transparency to the American people. I applaud the members of Congress who stood up to do their duty. This has always been about doing what’s right and putting the country first. When our elected officials and institutions work to protect our democracy rather than work to protect a lawless president, the American people win.   

“In this country, no one should be above the law. That is why over two years ago, I started a grassroots movement dedicated to holding Donald Trump accountable. And the American people have made their voices heard — over 8.3 million Americans have signed our petition to impeach this president. Today we take a patriotic step toward preserving our democracy and the rule of law. I am confident that holding public hearings and showing the people the facts will force Republicans to listen to their constituents and vote to remove Donald Trump from office. Only then will we be able to restore our confidence in Congress and move our country forward together.”

Biden for President

Statement by Vice President Joe Biden on the House Impeachment Proceedings Vote

In his farewell address, George Washington warned that foreign intervention in our elections could pose one of the most insidious dangers to our democracy. 

Over the last 5 weeks, overwhelming and distressing signs have emerged, one after another, that President Trump abused the very same office Washington held to use American military aid in an attempt to coerce a foreign country, Ukraine, into undermining the sovereignty of our elections. He has weaponized the institutions of our government for political purposes, subverting our national security for his own political gain. He has done this with the systematic use of lies and conspiracy theories that have led members of his own administration to take extraordinary actions to speak out and oppose him. 

Donald Trump is testing the institutions of our democracy every day. But they are holding. Today, the House did its constitutional duty to proceed with a solemn investigation of unprecedented wrongdoing. Members of Congress take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution when they are sworn in, not an oath to their party or to the president. Congress must do its duty to ensure that Donald Trump's assault on the Constitution does not seep beyond his presidency, with a lasting and devastating impact on our democracy.  

###